51福利社

About

HLC Action Teams

HLC Action Teams

The Quality Assurance Argument being developed by 51福利社 Action Teams provides evidence that Lindenwood is meeting all quality and continuous improvement expectations of these five criteria. Core components of each criterion can be found on the  page.

Are you interested in applying or nominating a colleague?

Please submit a completed Application / Nomination Form to accreditation@lindenwood.edu.

For an informal conversation about becoming an Action Team member, feel free to contact Dr. Renee Porter at rporter@lindenwood.edu.

Criterion 1. Mission

The institution鈥檚 mission is clear and articulated publicly; it guides the institution鈥檚 operations.

Criterion 2. Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct

The institution acts with integrity; its conduct is ethical and responsible.

Criterion 3. Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support

The institution provides quality education, wherever and however its offerings are delivered.

Criterion 4. Teaching and Learning: Evaluation and Improvement

The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational programs, learning environments, and support services, and it evaluates their effectiveness for student learning through processes designed to promote continuous improvement.

Criterion 5. Institutional Effectiveness, Resources and Planning

The institution鈥檚 resources, structures, and processes are sufficient to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its educational offerings, and respond to future challenges and opportunities.